![]() |
| That's Jack on the right |
First off, the music was great, really enjoyable. I hadn't heard Jack's working band before, but have loved his own recorded ensembles over the years. Now I must add the caveat that Jack is one of my all time heroes, having first heard him (like many (using "many" in a very loose sense, meaning more specifically "many jazz musicians" ) of my generation) (BTW I realize (like right here) that I am in love with nested parentheses today. Must be the LISP (or more specifically Scheme) programmer lurking in my soul...) on one the numerous Keith Jarrett "Standards Trio" recordings which also feature bassist Gary Peacock. I actually think the first album I heard was "Bye Bye Blackbird", recorded as a tribute to the recently deceased Miles Davis (at some point in time, each of the three trio members were under the employ of the Dark Prince of Jazz) . Upon first hearing him it immediately struck me (as a novice jazz listener) how distinct Dejohnette's sound was, specifically his tone, in that both his drums and cymbals were extremely dark and dry (Gearhead geeks will note his longtime use of Sonor drums, and his progression from Paiste (Hello 602 Dark Ride, he helped invent you!) to Istanbul (pre-split) to his own lines of Sabian Signature cymbals) As I heard more and more of his music, his own projects and collaborative efforts showcased not only his drumming but also his compositional prowess (and sometimes his piano and keyboard skills). Recordings by his Special Edition, Directions, and New Directions stick out in my memory for their uniqueness, and musicality.
Now, the NPR pages hosting the streaming audio made it very clear that Jack turns 70 years old this week, and that he is not slowing down as he reaches that milestone. While listening to this very recent performance with my family I commented out loud that this is some great drumming, and from a 70 year old to boot. I had to clarify that it was not "great drumming for a 70 year old" or "great drumming considering he's 70" but strictly great playing that any jazz musician would aspire to. It was the question that I heard next which prompted me to write this rambling entry: "Well, does he sound better than he did before? Has he improved rather than declined at this age?" That had me stumped.
My generation of musicians were the ones who basically saw the tail end of surviving swing-era musicians, and throughout our developing years witnessed the passing of the majority of bebop-era players, with a (very) few notable exceptions (Roy Haynes, for example still plays, and he sounds amah-zing.) There are instances where legendary musicians play on into their twilight years, although mental and/or physical advancement (or sometimes years of (extrinsic or intrinsic) abuse) takes it's toll on their musical ability. I remember thinking, when one of these musicians would come to town to perform, "Gee I guess I really should go and see so-and-so even if I think the playing won't be stellar, just because he/she is a legend and might not be around much longer." Which I know (I know!) is a very lame attitude. (Hey, I was young and stupid. At least I'm no longer young.)
Regardless, there are counterexamples, where players can sound strong right into their 70's or 80's or beyond. Roy Haynes, mentioned above, or Paul Motian, Kenny Wheeler, Benny Golson all exemplify this phenomenon. The question, however, was whether they actually improved/progressed in their playing, past the "prime" of their career. Obviously the greatest improvement, development and establishment of musical voice will happen in the first (more or less) half of a person's musical path, but I would argue that many if not most musicians are drawn to music as it is a lifelong study; no one is ever "finished" studying music. And yet, for a player who has developed an instantly recognizable and totally unique voice, who has changed the way people listen to, interact with and play the drum set, and who has maintained a prolific career performing music for 50 years, how much has he "improved" in the last, say 20 years? Which coincidentally is about the same period of time I have been listening to his music. I can hear the difference between his playing up to 1969 (with Charles Lloyd, Bill Evans or Miles Davis) and his playing around 1980 and beyond (e.g. the Keith Jarrett standards trio, Special Edition) but mostly from context: the tone/ambience of the recorded drums and cymbals, the style of the music, the other players in the ensemble. But I would have a much harder time (I think) blindfold-testing between his playing in 1983 and his playing in 2002 (say if you A-B'ed Jarrett Trio records Standards Vol 1 and The Out-of-Towners, a 19-year span between them) if I didn't already know those recordings well. Dejohnette had already established his main contributions to the continuum of jazz drumming by the 80's I believe (ready for debate here) but at no point do I believe he sat complacently coasting on his achievements, letting his development (never mind his skills) stagnate. And yet I can't place what it is that has changed about his drumming in the last 30 or so years. It certainly has changed, but I can't articulate specifically in what way yet. The closest I can get is that as musicians develop past the "developmental" stage of their career, they can proceed to clarify and distill their musical voice, maybe like pruning a tree but without the harsh "cutting branches" part of the analogy.
So the point is: how much does a 70 year old student of jazz have to improve? A 60 year old? A 45 year old? Now it's hitting a little closer to home, as I inch more toward those milestones, how much hope do I have to get my shit together? What do I actually want to improve upon in the coming years? I have no answers, only questions... (What is the sound of one hand clapping? Does the flag move or does the wind move?)


